首页> 外文OA文献 >Peripheral aberration measurements: Elliptical pupil transformation and variations in horizontal coma across the visual field
【2h】

Peripheral aberration measurements: Elliptical pupil transformation and variations in horizontal coma across the visual field

机译:外围像差测量:椭圆光瞳变换和视野中水平彗差的变化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The aim was to determine the critical eccentricity at which two methods of elaborating peripheral wavefront measurements are significantly different and to characterise horizontal coma in healthy young adults. Methods: Peripheral aberrations were determined for 20 observers for central and eight peripheral gaze positions up to 20° using an IRX-3 aberrometer. In one subject, additional measurements up to 40° were obtained. Two definitions of stretching coefficients were compared. The raw empirical data were compared with theoretical modelling. Results: For both 3.5mm and 6.0mm pupils, no significant differences were observed between recalculated and non-recalculated elliptical pupils for both methods (p > 0.05) up to 20° eccentricity. For eccentricities greater than 20° and up to 40°, significant differences between circular and elliptical pupils at some eccentricities were apparent, which corresponded to theoretical models. Wide individual variations in horizontal coma across the peripheral field were observed. Conclusions: The data suggest that for eyes with average levels of aberrations, the elliptical transformation is of no practical importance for eccentricities up to 20°. In some cases the slope of horizontal coma was reversed compared with previous findings in normal eyes. © 2011 Optometrists Association Australia.
机译:背景:目的是确定临界偏心率,在该偏心率下,阐述外围波前测量的两种方法显着不同,并表征健康年轻人的水平昏迷。方法:使用IRX-3像差仪为20位观察者确定中央和8个周边凝视位置至20°的周边像差。在一个受试者中,获得了高达40°的额外测量值。比较了拉伸系数的两种定义。将原始经验数据与理论模型进行比较。结果:对于3.5mm和6.0mm的瞳孔,在20°偏心率下,两种方法的重新计算的椭圆形瞳孔和未重新计算的椭圆形瞳孔之间均无显着差异(p> 0.05)。对于大于20°且高达40°的偏心率,在某些偏心率下,圆形和椭圆形瞳孔之间的明显差异是明显的,这与理论模型相对应。观察到整个周边视野中水平昏迷的广泛个体差异。结论:数据表明,对于平均像差水平的眼睛,椭圆变换对于高达20°的偏心率没有实际意义。在某些情况下,水平慧形的斜率与正常人以前的发现相比是相反的。 ©2011澳大利亚验光师协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号